The insane story behind Sriracha’s collapse

Hey everyone,

If you’re a business owner, you’ve probably figured this out: nobody is coming to save you. 

Somewhere along the way, we all learn we need to rely on ourselves. 

And that instinct has probably saved your butt a few times. Treating external dependency as a threat can be valuable.

But ask yourself: is that still working for you?

Because sometimes, fierce independence can actually be limiting you. 

That’s what happened to Sriracha. Story time.

—

Quick reminder: Dave Kline's leadership accelerator is launching a new cohort May 5. He's the real deal. More on that below, or check it out right now. (Code GIRDLEY for $250 off.)

—

David Tran left Vietnam in 1979. After getting out of the army, he’d been making and selling his own chili sauce in Saigon, but after the communist takeover, he watched the government seize private businesses, and had to smuggle gold in condensed milk cans to get his family out. 

It got baked in deep: never be dependent on anyone but yourself. 

So he came to America, with basically nothing — except just a great recipe for hot sauce. 

And that “trust nobody” attitude served him for 35 years.

He built Huy Fong Foods (the rooster-bottle Sriracha) into a $150 million a year business with no marketing, no investors, no outside capital, and not even a trademark on "Sriracha" itself. (Granted, it was a town in Thailand, but still.)

But eventually, it came back to bite him. 

By 2006, Tran found himself dependent. 95% of his peppers came from one supplier, Underwood Ranches.

But the dependency went both ways: Huy Fong was 80% of Underwood’s revenue, with $18 million in prepayments flowing every year and 1,700 acres of peppers planted on a handshake agreement. 

Plus, they’d been doing business for 28 years.

But David Tran saw this as a vulnerability. 

And around 2014, he got sneaky. He built a competing farm operation under his sister-in-law, tried to poach Underwood’s COO, and flew a drone over Underwood’s fields (“out of curiosity”) to learn about their growing strategy.

Then in 2016, he waited until Underwood was on vacation and sent a termination notice, leaving their entire season’s harvest unfunded.

The courts didn’t like it. They found misrepresentation, breach of contract, and fraud. $23.3M in damages, $10M of that punitive.

What’s interesting here is, David wasn’t being inconsistent. 

He was running exactly the same program Vietnam had installed in him: identify a dependency, then eliminate it. 

But survival instinct doesn’t distinguish a threat from an asset.

That’s what can happen when you don’t update your internal operating system. 

→ Related read: How BlackBerry's leverage over carriers became the thing carriers wanted to destroy

Our brains are incredibly good at justifying our actions. 

The lizard brain makes an instant decision, then we find a valid reason afterwards to explain ourselves. 

It happens all the time, and we don’t even know we’re doing it.

So David didn’t think of himself as betraying a partner. He could build a real business case for what he was doing. But he'd operated this way his whole life. 

And why wouldn’t he? Self-reliance had worked for him! He'd built $150 million without owing a soul anything. His instincts had been right, consistently, for decades.

But that’s the trap. When your instincts have worked long enough, you stop interrogating them. It got David Tran. It got George Eastman, the CEO of Kodak. It got Napoleon.

So here’s my advice: 

The next time you need to make a big decision, pressure-test your instincts.

It’s not about distrusting yourself. This is about making sure you’re awake at the wheel.

—

Thanks for reading, everybody. Have a great week.

Michael

P.S. I'm doing a lecture next month on how to do SEO in the AI age, with my business partner Rodrigo. Does ChatGPT recommend your business?

P.P.S. Here are my upcoming free lectures, come on out!